![]() ![]() Photographer and friend, Michael Woloszynowicz, has kindly allowed us to use his images to showcase the difference. I was doing myself a complete disservice. In fact, going back to the raw converter I was using before makes me realize just how much of an uphill battle it was trying to achieve beautiful color tones in my images. ![]() The reality is that it processes them so much more realistically than the current (and most popular) choice for processing RAW files. Not only could I not make up for it, I couldn’t get anywhere near what Capture One was getting me in regards to how it processed colors. Still in denial, I thought whatever the difference might be, I could surely make up for it within Photoshop. I initially thought that it would be an undertaking to learn a new program and that the benefits couldn’t be worth it. I couldn’t believe what I was missing out on all of those years before. ![]() I started using Capture One and was surprised at how colors rendered. As I started working in the commercial world, photographers seemed to use Capture One, for tethering and processing. Before that time, I was oblivious to the benefits. It’s only in the last few years that I’ve been using Capture One. If this was news to you, then this article is for you! I was missing out One thing that I keep getting asked is, “Why would I switch over to Capture One Pro 8 from what I’m currently using? What does it do better than what I already use?” It seems as though a lot of people do not know that different programs process raw files differently. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |